Results
In general, respondents had a greater preference for drugs that increase survival, where there was greater confidence in the effectiveness of the new drug and which increased patients’ capacity to do their usual activities. Preferences were not homogenous, the latent class analysis identified three groups: Class 3 (58%) demonstrated a strong preference for improvements in survival; Class 2 (21%) showed a strong preference for confidence in the evidence; and Class 1 (21%) positively valued increased government expenditure.
Conclusion
These results are consistent with previous studies that used different methodologies in showing a preference for drugs with improved survival and quality of life. However, addressing a societal preference for greater confidence in the evidence - reducing evidential uncertainty - represents a methodological and policy challenge for the evaluation of drugs in rare diseases.