Mathew Shanley, Rare Disease Report. FEBRUARY 05, 2018
Jupiter Orphan Therapeutics, Inc. (JOT) announced this morning that it intends to submit an Investigational New Drug (IND) application to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Jotrol in mucopolysaccharidosis type 1 (MPS I), among other indications, within the next few weeks.
"We will initiate the IND in MPS I and plan to cross-reference PK and safety data in follow-on indications. We are well prepared to gear up for a study in Friedreich's Ataxia (FA) and will thereafter determine if Mitochondrial Encephalopathy, Lactic Acidosis, and Stroke-like episodes (MELAS) or Leber's Hereditary Optic Neuropathy (LHON) will be the 3rd indication we approach. An IND submission for FA is planned for quarter 2 of 2018, and for MELAS and/or LHON no later than quarter 4," stated JOT Chief Security Officer Dr. Marshall Hayward in a press release.
JOT has used an isomer of the resveratrol to develop a pharmaceutical grade compound that can be properly tested in clinical trials, and successful pre-clinical data have shown that it can increase levels of frataxin.
Monday, February 5, 2018
To study the genotype - phenotype correlation of Friedreich’s Ataxia (FRDA) patients in Indian population
I. Ahmad, A. Kumar Srivastava, M. Faruq, V. Padma Srivastava M., Parkinsonism & Related Disorders, Volume 46, Supplement 2, January 2018, Page e7, ISSN 1353-8020, doi:10.1016/j.parkreldis.2017.11.023.
This is the largest genotype and phenotype series on FRDA in Indian population. This study showed GAA1 size affects the cerebellar atrophy, muscles twisting and tremor.
This is the largest genotype and phenotype series on FRDA in Indian population. This study showed GAA1 size affects the cerebellar atrophy, muscles twisting and tremor.
Paediatric genomics: diagnosing rare disease in children
Caroline F. Wright, David R. FitzPatrick & Helen V. Firth, Nature Reviews Genetics, Published online:05 February 2018, doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.116
The majority of rare diseases affect children, most of whom have an underlying genetic cause for their condition. However, making a molecular diagnosis with current technologies and knowledge is often still a challenge. Paediatric genomics is an immature but rapidly evolving field that tackles this issue by incorporating next-generation sequencing technologies, especially whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing, into research and clinical workflows. This complex multidisciplinary approach, coupled with the increasing availability of population genetic variation data, has already resulted in an increased discovery rate of causative genes and in improved diagnosis of rare paediatric disease. Importantly, for affected families, a better understanding of the genetic basis of rare disease translates to more accurate prognosis, management, surveillance and genetic advice; stimulates research into new therapies; andenables provision of better support.
Ethical, legal and social implications of paediatric genomics:
Paediatric genomics has many of the same ethical, legal and social issues that clinical genetics has been dealing with for decades, such as reproductive autonomy, informed consent for research, misattributed parentage and implications for family members. Issues which are more complicated for paediatric testing: the reduced capacity of the child to consent to testing and/or research means that parents and clinicians have an increased role in deciding what may be in the best interests of the child. Most of the novel ethical issues in the era of genomics relate to the storage, interpretation and access of data.
Data storage: it is not clear who should have access to that data and when they should be allowed access to it. Should access be limited to clinicians involved in the direct care of the family or opened to researchers in industry and/or academia?
Confidentiality versus data access: Parents are often asked to make decisions about their child’s data that may have irreversible repercussions. Should these decisions be revisited when the child approaches and passes the age of majority?
Duty of care: For clinicians, the issue of data access is linked to the question of whether their duty of care is limited to finding a diagnosis for the child’s immediate problems or whether it extends beyond the scope of the initial investigation. The duty of care could also extend to looking for incidental predispositions to adult-onset conditions or to adverse drug reactions either in the child or their parents. In general, investigating children for adult-onset conditions for which there is no early treatment is not recommended.
The majority of rare diseases affect children, most of whom have an underlying genetic cause for their condition. However, making a molecular diagnosis with current technologies and knowledge is often still a challenge. Paediatric genomics is an immature but rapidly evolving field that tackles this issue by incorporating next-generation sequencing technologies, especially whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome sequencing, into research and clinical workflows. This complex multidisciplinary approach, coupled with the increasing availability of population genetic variation data, has already resulted in an increased discovery rate of causative genes and in improved diagnosis of rare paediatric disease. Importantly, for affected families, a better understanding of the genetic basis of rare disease translates to more accurate prognosis, management, surveillance and genetic advice; stimulates research into new therapies; andenables provision of better support.
Ethical, legal and social implications of paediatric genomics:
Paediatric genomics has many of the same ethical, legal and social issues that clinical genetics has been dealing with for decades, such as reproductive autonomy, informed consent for research, misattributed parentage and implications for family members. Issues which are more complicated for paediatric testing: the reduced capacity of the child to consent to testing and/or research means that parents and clinicians have an increased role in deciding what may be in the best interests of the child. Most of the novel ethical issues in the era of genomics relate to the storage, interpretation and access of data.
Data storage: it is not clear who should have access to that data and when they should be allowed access to it. Should access be limited to clinicians involved in the direct care of the family or opened to researchers in industry and/or academia?
Confidentiality versus data access: Parents are often asked to make decisions about their child’s data that may have irreversible repercussions. Should these decisions be revisited when the child approaches and passes the age of majority?
Duty of care: For clinicians, the issue of data access is linked to the question of whether their duty of care is limited to finding a diagnosis for the child’s immediate problems or whether it extends beyond the scope of the initial investigation. The duty of care could also extend to looking for incidental predispositions to adult-onset conditions or to adverse drug reactions either in the child or their parents. In general, investigating children for adult-onset conditions for which there is no early treatment is not recommended.
Tandem repeats mediating genetic plasticity in health and disease
Anthony J. Hannan, Nature Reviews Genetics, Published online: 05 February 2018, doi:10.1038/nrg.2017.115
Accumulating evidence suggests that many classes of DNA repeats exhibit attributes that distinguish them from other genetic variants, including the fact that they are more liable to mutation; this enables them to mediate genetic plasticity. The expansion of tandem repeats, particularly of short tandem repeats, can cause a range of disorders (including Huntington disease, various ataxias, motor neuron disease, frontotemporal dementia, fragile X syndrome and other neurological disorders), and emerging data suggest that tandem repeat polymorphisms (TRPs) can also regulate gene expression in healthy individuals. TRPs in human genomes may also contribute to the missing heritability of polygenic disorders. A better understanding of tandem repeats and their associated repeatome, as well as their capacity for genetic plasticity via both germline and somatic mutations, is needed to transform our understanding of the role of TRPs in health and disease.
Accumulating evidence suggests that many classes of DNA repeats exhibit attributes that distinguish them from other genetic variants, including the fact that they are more liable to mutation; this enables them to mediate genetic plasticity. The expansion of tandem repeats, particularly of short tandem repeats, can cause a range of disorders (including Huntington disease, various ataxias, motor neuron disease, frontotemporal dementia, fragile X syndrome and other neurological disorders), and emerging data suggest that tandem repeat polymorphisms (TRPs) can also regulate gene expression in healthy individuals. TRPs in human genomes may also contribute to the missing heritability of polygenic disorders. A better understanding of tandem repeats and their associated repeatome, as well as their capacity for genetic plasticity via both germline and somatic mutations, is needed to transform our understanding of the role of TRPs in health and disease.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
