G. Tai, L. A. Corben, E. M. Yiu and M. B. Delatycki; Acta Neurologica Scandinavica, Version of Record online: 28 SEP 2016 DOI: 10.1111/ane.12693
This study aimed to examine the relationship between SF-36 version 2 (SF-36V2) summary scores and Friedreich ataxia (FRDA) clinical characteristics, and to investigate the responsiveness of the scale, in comparison with the Friedreich Ataxia Rating Scale (FARS), over 1, 2 and 3 years.
Our findings suggest that despite physical decline, individuals with FRDA have relatively stable mental well-being. This study demonstrates that the SF-36V2 is unlikely to be a useful tool for identifying clinical change in FRDA therapeutic trials.
Thursday, September 29, 2016
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)